Thursday, February 25, 2010

Is the past another country?

Brad DeLong gave me the opportunity today to put a deeply-felt conviction of mine into words.

Brad was quoting from a blog called The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, whose author, Rufus F., was reflecting on the Odyssey.

[Brad]: Rufus F. on the Homecoming of Odysseus:

Homer “The Odyssey” | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen: I find his homecoming strange though. After winning a test of strength, Odysseus and Telemachus slaughter the suitors. The whole scene is excessive; he claims to kill them for their outrageous violence, but it amounts to boorish behavior and a failed plot to kill Telemachus. It would make more sense to run them off: “Scram, wimps!” Instead, Odysseus kills every last man for having dropped in for a visit and deciding to stay for several years...

[Brad:] It's considerably worse than that: consider the servant-women of Odysseus's palace who had consorted with the suitors:

"I will tell you the truth, my son," answered Euryclea. "There are fifty women in the house whom we teach to do things, such as carding wool, and all kinds of household work. Of these, twelve in all have misbehaved, and have been wanting in respect to me, and also to Penelope....

[T]he women came down in a body, weeping and wailing bitterly.... [T]hey took the women out and hemmed them in the narrow space between the wall of the domed room and that of the yard, so that they could not get away: and Telemachus said to the other two, "I shall not let these women die a clean death, for they were insolent to me and my mother, and used to sleep with the suitors."

So saying he made a ship's cable fast to one of the bearing-posts that supported the roof of the domed room, and secured it all around the building, at a good height, lest any of the women's feet should touch the ground; and as thrushes or doves beat against a net that has been set for them in a thicket just as they were getting to their nest, and a terrible fate awaits them, even so did the women have to put their heads in nooses one after the other and die most miserably. Their feet moved convulsively for a while, but not for very long...

Here's what I said in comments (touched up a little):

I am not so sure that the past is another country... Can't you imagine a similar scene taking place in another neighborhood in our own time, with the woman killers giving a similar justification? Remember that even in his own time that Odysseus was a smalltime pirate; today, unless he got particularly ambitious and inconvenienced the big guys,perhaps by hijacking a ship off the Horn of Africa, he would rate no space in the New York Times. Certainly the killing of the insolent women would get no coverage. Neither would the destruction of their elementary school or women's health clinic.

My point was, that the past is not one country, and our time is not a single country either, and the differences between different countries in any one era are very big sometimes' and broad similarities exist between some past countries and some in the present. Not everything that existed in the past exists in some corner of our own world now, but I believe that many things that existed in the time of, say, the Greek dark ages have rough analogues today. The failure to recognize that, I think, leads to one of the big errors of historical understanding: focusing on one country, one short period, one culture, one imperial court, one literary circle, and saying "this was the human experience on planet Earth at such and such a time."

And another serious mistake is to believe that some phenomenon that you find impressive or repulsive is absolutely unique in human history.

Labels: , , , , ,


Blogger Another Damned Medievalist said...

I expect it also depends on how you wee the other country. I have always thought of the quote in terms of the past being as alien and as familiar as another country in the here and now. Often people expect *their* past (i.e., the past of their country or people) to be more connected to their own values and ideas of heritage than they are, and have such a hard time separating it from their own experiences in comparison to the past of a culture that is already foreign. Conversely, the familiarity can help a person understand better, and seeing a familiarity in the past might also open up the possibility of seeing the familiarities in other cultures.

10:21 PM  
Blogger Will McLean said...

The past is still here - it is just unevenly distributed

11:39 AM  
Blogger Emrys Eustace, hygt Broom said...

Firmly agreed. "Oh, those wacky ancients! No one today would behave like that!"... Until you look around the world. Stoning women for being raped. In-laws banishing widows to the streets. Jealous lovers shooting up workplaces. There's nothing anachronistic about wanton violence, unfortunately.

Additionally, his article paints a fairly friendly picture of the suitors of X. To reduce the crimes of his wife's suitors to "having dropped in for a visit and deciding to stay for several years..." is, well, understated. Here in the US, we felt so strongly about unwelcome armed houseguests, we even dedicated the 3rd Amendment to the issue.

And the servant-women? They didn't just sleep around a bit; they actively conspired with the hostile houseguests against the lady of the house.

2:46 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home